Anyone know will it be widescreen or 4:3 ratio?
Interesting question. I think the answer is, "Nobody knows."
For all the carping about the imperfect composite shots, I hope everybody realizes that we wouldn't have the
B5 DVDs
at all if The Sci-Fi Channel hadn't had demanded new widescreen transfers as part of its deal to air the show. They felt they needed something "new" to offer viewers since the show had aired a number of times on TNT, and because the rival network was running it six days a week (and twice on a couple of Saturdays) to get in one more complete run before SFC took the show over. (TNT aired "SiL" on a Saturday morning. SFC started airing the series the following Monday.) WB was being bombarded with requests for the series on DVD, but most of them insisted on full season sets in widescreen. (Fans having no idea of the problems anamorphic widescreen processing would entail.) Warner Home Video didn't want to pay to upfront to remaster 22 episodes in widescreen and produce the DVDs when they were still unsure of the show's appeal. But they also didn't want to produce a 4:3 only set that fans would ignore - which many of us would have because we had every reason to believe that a pristine widescreen edition was possible.
The SFC deal got Warner Home Video new widescreen masters for free. (I don't know if Warner Bros. Domestic Television or The Sci-Fi Channel itself paid for the new transfers. Either way the money didn't come out of Warner Home Video's budget, and that's all they cared about.) That's why they were willing to go forward with the first test disc and ultimately take a chance on the first season. Without the widescreen version, for all its faults, we wouldn't have
B5 on DVD
period and we certainly wouldn't be discussing the details of a
Crusade release.
When it came to the 13 episodes of
Crusade somebody balked at spending the money to create widescreen masters. It wasn't going to be an on-going "stripped" series like
B5 and didn't have the same potential for return on investment. Whoever paid for the widescreen
B5 didn't see the need to do the same for the sequel. In answer to a fan question at the time, either SFC or JMS said that the initial run of
Crusade would be 4:3 and that they would revisit the widescreen issue later. Evidently they never did.
I
know that at some point JMS and I had an exchange (and it may have been via private e-mail or in some other venue not archived by
JMS News about the possibility of rendering the CGI in Super35 format, if not in "pure widescreen" for
Crusade and future projects - something that had not been possible when they started production on
B5:
We did not have the tech, at that time, to do our comps in widescreen super35 versions. The software that we used to dump the footage into couldn't handle it. So we had no choice but to render the CGI and the comps in standard ratio.
I don't know if this later post points an attempt to do so:
We have, from the beginning, been shooting in widescreen and doing a complex audio mix and delivering conformed negatives for the purpose of working in the HDTV mode. We plan to do more in terms of digital delivery and 5-1 audio sound for Crusade, among some other tricks we're planning.
If it does, a widescreen
Crusade might not have the same problem with composite shots that
B5 exhibited. If not, then the comp shots would be the same.
Another factor in the
B5 DVD release is that by the time it started, Sci-Fi was
airing the show in widescreen and advertising it as "the way it was meant to be seen". Doing a 4:3 DVD release would have seemed like a step backwards to the many new fans who were discovering the series on Sci-Fi and for whom the widescreen edition was the only one they'd ever seen. (Those of us who got hooked on the series in its initial release should realize that we are probably now a
minority of the show's fans.)
Crusade has never aired in widescreen and there has never been a compelling reason for Warner Bros. Domestic Television or any network or cable channel to pay for new transfers. Warner Home Video would certainly be reluctant to spend its own money to create such transfers absent clear evidence that they'd gain enough in extra sales to cover the costs and return a profit. OTOH, WBDT may at this point think that
Crusade can command a higher asking price when it is offered again in syndication (as a tie-in to the release of
TMoS or in conjunction with a spin-off project) if it is widescreen, and therefore be willing to pay for or at least contribute to the cost of new widescreen transfers.
If Sci-Fi had broadcast
Crusade in widescreen this would be a no-brainer. But the fact that they didn't means the decision will come down to money. If some Warner entity or combination of entities sees a good business reason for creating new widescreen masters than the DVDs will be widescreen. If not, not.
We'll just have to wait for the official announcement. Right now I'd say the odds are 70/30 in favor of a 4:3 release, but that's just my completely unscientific WAG.
Regards,
Joe