I flinched at some sequences involving the 3D. It's certainly not how I remember old school 3D... and things did seem to move out beyond the screen. Perhaps I am overstating the effects here... but then it was my first cinematic 3D experience (I've only ever used 3D on the rare occasions it's been on television or in comics as a kid.
Length is possibly an issue, but I personally don't have a problem with long movies. The 2D trailers on the net did not do it justice.
50 earth pence for the glasses and 2 earth pounds extra for the ticket.The extra money for seeing it in 3D is presumably for the specs. I think it was worth it.
My kids really want to see this one, and would love to see it in 3D ... problem is, I have a damaged left eye and lack stereoscopic vision. I assume that there is therefore little point in me taking them to a 3D showing? Or has the 3D technology moved on to the extent that I can happily watch sans glasses and not need to clean my eyeballs out afterwards.
Well that wasn't strictly true. There were a few humans allowed to stay. The situation reminded me a little of The Mission only with a reversed outcome.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.