And it really was a lot more multi-cultural than the Lynch movie or the Sci-Fi miniseries. It made it feel more of a story about humanity (although by then I’d think the races would be mixed much more, it’s over 10,000 years in our future, after all).
And it really was a lot more multi-cultural than the Lynch movie or the Sci-Fi miniseries. It made it feel more of a story about humanity (although by then I’d think the races would be mixed much more, it’s over 10,000 years in our future, after all).
Moonface said:That's an argument that was made for the other versions with a less heterogenic cast: "It's 10k years in the future, they're all pretty much mixed up by now, so everyone has about the same skin tone". I like the mixed cast way better, and I LOVED Liet Kynes.
Yeah, glad to see the cast be more diverse. Makes sense. Had lots of fun laughing at the neckbeard fanboys screaming "DUNE IS RUINED... WOKENESS EVERYWHERE... DUNE ISN'T POLITICAL BRO... Hahahaha. Fucking hell. I am assuming most of them haven't ever read the books.
I saw a You Tube video of someone replying to some a criticism that it was a "white savior" story. The critic clearly hasn't read the rest of the book series. I hope this director can do more than 2, I'd love to see him direct the entire original series.
Ohh... Then I had to get gas Tuesday and I'm 90% certain somebody syphoned gas outa my car while I was in the theater for like 3hrs. I hope they choked on it!
In the Lynch Version I can see why they see Dune as a white savior trope movie, in the sci fi channel version they address the point of the book that Paul is not a savior but a false prophet (he and Jessica have a short debate about that while they are at Sietch Tabr (or an other sietch, nut quite sure on this detail anymore)).
In the new version this is also mentioned, as Paul responds to Jessica upon their arrival on dune, that the Fremen only believe what they were told to believe.
I did hope for a less subtle approach on this point as I was anticipating that Dune will get heat for this, if this twist on the story is not made blatantly clear.
Anyway... After 25 minutes of trailers. I saw 'Part One' and was like ohh no, because then you know this is gonna be the sad movie with a questionable ending depending on where they end it. I was sitting there hoping it wouldn't have a bad ending, and I think it had a good start to finish. I hope they keep doing them because I would like to see the whole story unfold as I've never read a Dune book.
I was surprised the Diamond guy died I thought he made it further in the other movies but that might be my mind playing tricks on me.
Ohh... Then I had to get gas Tuesday and I'm 90% certain somebody syphoned gas outa my car while I was in the theater for like 3hrs. I hope they choked on it!
The Bene Gesserit are in the long-term game of shaping humanity, they did lay down the myths the Kwisatz Haderach would need to easily take over the Fremen population. So the story really has deep roots of manipulation and population control on epic scales.
I saw a You Tube video of someone replying to some a criticism that it was a "white savior" story. The critic clearly hasn't read the rest of the book series. I hope this director can do more than 2, I'd love to see him direct the entire original series.
I was worried at first that the box office might not be big enough with the HBO Max showing, but the second film has already been greenlit.
Ohh... Then I had to get gas Tuesday and I'm 90% certain somebody syphoned gas outa my car while I was in the theater for like 3hrs. I hope they choked on it!
But Dune is an epic story, the series covers thousands of years (a bit like Asimov's Foundation series). Even by the end of book 1 it's really just the end of the beginning, as they say.
I think Dune, itself, was epic. I think the stories that followed....just didn't fit. They felt tacked-on. Maybe this comes from being spoiled by Babylon 5 in which the story framework was thought out (for the most part) in advance. The Dune novels almost certainly weren't.
I think Dune, itself, was epic. I think the stories that followed....just didn't fit. They felt tacked-on. Maybe this comes from being spoiled by Babylon 5 in which the story framework was thought out (for the most part) in advance. The Dune novels almost certainly weren't.
Really? I never read the later books, only the original and some prequels by his son, but from what I gathered (from the mini series and interviews and Quinns Ideas) the first book was primarily the intro, setting Paul up as charismatic leader and him gathering his following. The critique of such leaders then comes in the later books with the Jihads. And after all, the notion that charismatic leaders pose a big problem was the reason Frank Herbert wrote the book, as he said in interviews over and over again (and was quoted here already)
Or did I remember this wrong? It's quite some time since I actually read dune books...
[
Wow, then they have fundamentally misunderstood Dune as a whole.
I wrote the Dune series because I had this idea that charismatic leaders ought to come with a warning label on their forehead: "May be dangerous to your health." One of the most dangerous presidents we had in this century was John Kennedy because people said "Yes Sir Mr. Charismatic Leader what do we do next?" and we wound up in Vietnam. And I think probably the most valuable president of this century was Richard Nixon. Because he taught us to distrust government and he did it by example.”
― Frank Herbert
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.