<blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr>Originally posted by channe:
<font color=yellow>Blinders? Pah! You're just as bad as I am.
Dude, if Rangers was going to be as good as some of the stuff I've been seeing on Jeremiah, then Kirk would have just eaten Martel's dust...</font color=yellow><hr></blockquote>
Heh. Wasnt looking for a debate, just to get you riled up. I see it worked. /ubbthreads/images/icons/smile.gif
You still cant compare the two. In all honesty most of Kirks character was developed away from the TV Screen, somewhat in the movies, mostly in books (especially Shatner's books). TV, storytelling, and character building have come a long way in the last 35 years.
They are in two completely different eras, you have to appreaciate each for what they were, in their own timeframe, or not at all.
For the record I think B5 is by far a better series, and a better story, but TOS and TNG have a different kind of appeal. To me it is like comparing apples and oranges. They are so different it isnt even funny. Both of great quality, but very different in content and especially delivery.
But you are extremely biased when dealing with Rangers. I cant say as I blame you and it more than likely has to do with actual interaction of the cast members here, which is understandable. That was what I meant with the blinders comment. /ubbthreads/images/icons/wink.gif