Well, if you're interested, here's JMS's take on the subject:
<BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Verdana, arial">quote:</font><HR>
Will ItB spoil some of season one's mysteries?
That's an interesting question. When I sat down to write
In the Beginning, my feeling was that I should look at the long term. Would the hole in Sinclair's mind be the same mystery it was in season one (1), or would it be kind of known thereafter? If so, then do you want to play with the mystery, or set up what actually happened?
I figured, okay, let's go for the latter... let's let the audience know (which will mostly know by now anyway), and set up the background, with the characters not knowing [during] the first season. I took basic greek tragedy as my model, with
ItB functioning more or less as a Greek chorus that sets things up.
If you want to play it as a strict mystery, then no, probably don't go near ItB... but frankly, if I were going to start someone off on
B5, I'd definitely want to start with
ItB, which sort of skims in and out of the overall storyline in a beautiful fashion.
I know you probably couldn't have made a movie about the Earth-Minbari War without giving away the ending, but I was kind of hoping the details would be left more vague than they were for the benefit of new viewers.
I came to that part of my decision-making process, and realized that in 2, 5 or 10 years, the secret ain't gonna be secret anymore... so why not play into that, and make the audience aware up front, which adds a different kind of tension, like seeing the bomb under the table when the characters eating dinner don't know it's there. (2)<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
(1) That is, when S1 was first being aired. Lots of folks who are watching
B5 pick the show up during whatever season happens to be airing, and therefore know the truth about a lot of the "mysteries" long before they see S1. (This was true in my case, to a great extent.)
(2) A short-hand reference to a famous explanation of surprise vs. suspense by Alfred Hitchcock. You can surprise an audience by showing a couple sitting at a restaurant having lunch, and chatting about nothing, then suddenly having a bomb go off under their table. But you build
suspense by showing the audience a character planting the bomb, and then having the couple enter. While they're chatting away the audience is on tenterhooks wondering
when the bomb will suddenly go off, and what effect it will have. (And wanting to warn them.
)
S1 plays similarly if you already
know Sinclair's destiny and the reason for the Minbari actions, but
he doesn't. Either approach is valid, and I don't think that one is inherently better than the other. It is just that many fans who enjoyed the experience of puzzling out the mysteries and figuring out the clues assume that this is
necessary to enjoying the show. I don't believe that it is.
On balance, I agree with JMS that a new viewer gains more than he or she loses by seeing
ItB first. It sets up
all the major characters (except Garibaldi) and gives a glimpse of the epic scope of the series. It is also a better film than
The Gathering, and closer to the look and feel of the series, which I think is important.
TG can be off-putting to a new viewer.
Regards,
Joe
------------------
Joseph DeMartino
Sigh Corps
Pat Tallman Division
joseph-demartino@att.net