D
**DONOTDELETE**
Guest
<BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Verdana, arial">quote:</font><HR>Jnk5y wrote:
what would ya'll do with the telepaths if it was your decision. Would you let them run around free or would you still go with a program like the corp? Or do you have a different idea... do tell<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
I would choose the Minbari way. Let everyone live as they want -- as far as they respect others. To clarify issues, I would specify a new human right -- the right to be judged basing on deeds, not thoughts.
Privacy would have to be respected. Violations of telepathic nature could be investigated with the help of other telepaths. Attacks of telepathic nature could be defended against by other telepaths. Telepaths should be fully involved in all matters. Even in gambling. Naturally, every casiono should hire a telepathic security guard to prevent cheating.
One should never create closed and authoritarian organisations like Psi Corps. Some occasions would require organisations to hire telepaths for special duties. These professions should be carefully balanced and regulated.
-----
1. Law enforcement, military and intelligence services -- protecting confidential information against intrusion.
2. Medicine -- diagnosis and retreiving critical information from people unconscious or unable to express themselves.
3. Private business -- again, protecting information.
-----
Even if you fear telepathic intrusion, there should be no reason to fear telepaths. For every telepath willing to attack someone, a well-balanced society should have two telepaths willing to defend (or investigate the attack).
If secrets are important, their holders should ensure that they have telepaths to defend their secrets. Telepaths choose their loyalty just like others. They have concepts of right and wrong, similarities and differences, misunderstandings and conflicts. They are equally likely to betray an unjustified cause, or yield to temptations.
People are balanced with people. This practise is as old as humanity, and very simple. If you fear hackers, hire a computer security expert. Naturally he or she will have full access to your systems -- and not use it for harm. Due to trust, loyalty, morals and a sufficient salary.
-----
One matter would have to be avoided with special care. There should be no conflict between telepaths and mundanes. Special emphasis would be needed... for a transitional period of some centuries.
Because in a few centuries, the playing field would level itself -- via natural means. Telepath genes would spread and dissolve in the population. It would no longer be a rare privilege, just an intriguing and fairly common talent. And from time to time, there would be very talented individuals. Nothing unusual, nothing to be feared.
[This message has been edited by Lennier (edited February 12, 2002).]
what would ya'll do with the telepaths if it was your decision. Would you let them run around free or would you still go with a program like the corp? Or do you have a different idea... do tell<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
I would choose the Minbari way. Let everyone live as they want -- as far as they respect others. To clarify issues, I would specify a new human right -- the right to be judged basing on deeds, not thoughts.
Privacy would have to be respected. Violations of telepathic nature could be investigated with the help of other telepaths. Attacks of telepathic nature could be defended against by other telepaths. Telepaths should be fully involved in all matters. Even in gambling. Naturally, every casiono should hire a telepathic security guard to prevent cheating.
One should never create closed and authoritarian organisations like Psi Corps. Some occasions would require organisations to hire telepaths for special duties. These professions should be carefully balanced and regulated.
-----
1. Law enforcement, military and intelligence services -- protecting confidential information against intrusion.
2. Medicine -- diagnosis and retreiving critical information from people unconscious or unable to express themselves.
3. Private business -- again, protecting information.
-----
Even if you fear telepathic intrusion, there should be no reason to fear telepaths. For every telepath willing to attack someone, a well-balanced society should have two telepaths willing to defend (or investigate the attack).
If secrets are important, their holders should ensure that they have telepaths to defend their secrets. Telepaths choose their loyalty just like others. They have concepts of right and wrong, similarities and differences, misunderstandings and conflicts. They are equally likely to betray an unjustified cause, or yield to temptations.
People are balanced with people. This practise is as old as humanity, and very simple. If you fear hackers, hire a computer security expert. Naturally he or she will have full access to your systems -- and not use it for harm. Due to trust, loyalty, morals and a sufficient salary.
-----
One matter would have to be avoided with special care. There should be no conflict between telepaths and mundanes. Special emphasis would be needed... for a transitional period of some centuries.
Because in a few centuries, the playing field would level itself -- via natural means. Telepath genes would spread and dissolve in the population. It would no longer be a rare privilege, just an intriguing and fairly common talent. And from time to time, there would be very talented individuals. Nothing unusual, nothing to be feared.
[This message has been edited by Lennier (edited February 12, 2002).]