It took us almost a century to find the titantic and we sort of knew where to look.
Actually, we didn't, that was the problem. The various estimates and reports of the ship's last known position were mostly off by varying degrees. Ballard's expedition found the ship by looking in the "wrong" area. Also, the
Titanic was in waters
much deeper than what Naomi suggested flight 815 was found in. (Do you suppose the producers checke with the worldwide air traffic control system to make sure that nobody actually operates a "flight 815" before picking that name?
I'm pretty sure that certain famous or infamous flight numbers have been quietly "retired" to avoid freaking out the superstious or just bringing up bad memories for other people.)
And if a airliner is lost along a well-travelled route, with contact lost at a given point in the flight, it wouldn't be
that hard to figure out about where it went down. In (relatively) shallow waters, say to a few thousand feet, a magnetic anomaly detector would be able to find a mass of metal like an airliner fairly quickly. So it isn't that implausible that whoever is behind the fate of flight 815 could announce that the flight had been "found" and produce some phony video footage to "confirm" their story. They put the "location" deep enough that nobody without specialized and very expensive equipment could dive the wreck themselves to check the story, announced that the bodies were still aboard, making it a tomb and thus further discouraging folks from disturbing the site, and probably filed a salvage claim (like Bob Ballard
wishes he had for the
Titanic) just in case, to make sure there was no financial incentive for anyone to mount an expedition to the "crash site" despite its being a tomb.
So for the cost of a few models, some mannequins and a little special effects work, somebody solved the "mystery" of flight 815, ensured that the search would be called off and firmly fixed the eyes of the curious on a patch of ocean many, many miles from the Island. I'd call that a pretty good return on investment.
Regards,
Joe