<BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Verdana, arial">quote:</font><HR>Isn't that because, at least so the scuttlebut sez, that JMS was originally going to just switch the actors playing Sinclair?<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
Absolutley false, JMS
never considered recasting the role of Sinclair. He had planned to introduce a "Sheridan-like" character, one who had ties to the Shadow side of the story, in the second season when it was still assumed that Sinclair was going to stay.
When Michael O'Hare expressed reservations about staying on, JMS saw a chance to reach the end of the story by a different and more interesting route by transferring
part of Sinclair's arc to the Sheridan character, while still keeping Sinclair around in the background, ready to come back and finish out the rest of his arc.
If you go through the contemporary internet posts from JMS it is very clear that he never gave recasting the role of Sinclair a second thought.
<BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Verdana, arial">quote:</font><HR>I heard this a couple times elsewhere and always thought that it would have been a tad silly to do. So I do not put much into it.<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
Actually it used to be standard operating procedure in television to simply recast a major role if the actor was lost for any reason . (See
Bewitched,
Alias, Smith & Jones and every soap opera ever made.) Also happens with feature film series all the time.
JMS was something of an exception to this rule because, for continuity reasons, he preferred to create a new character - even though this often caused him writing headaches. (Na'Toth was one of the few instances where he simply cast a new actor in an existing role - in part because all that Narn makeup made it harder to spot the switch.
)
Regards,
Joe
------------------
Joseph DeMartino
Sigh Corps
Pat Tallman Division
joseph-demartino@att.net