Is the techno mage trilogy no good? I was actually counting on that to be great as these are characters you can do a lot with...But it's actually the second one...
My personal (and snarky) theory? Book Three was just way too revisionist, and people like me put their copies up on the market. Heck, I just sold the whole trilogy.
I personally didn't care for the Techno-Mage trilogy because I didn't feel that character of Galen in the books was the same one I saw in Crusade. It wasn't bad at all, just not to my taste. The Centauri trilogy was my favorite followed by the Telepath trilogy.
Jan
And, as I recall, I sold my books to you.
Is the techno mage trilogy no good? I was actually counting on that to be great as these are characters you can do a lot with...
Some people didn't like some of the plot of the plot twists, they thought it went against B5 the show proper in some cases.
And, as I recall, I sold my books to you.
Maybe, and if so (Can't check because I long ago flushed out the PM Inbox.), I'm grateful. However, I was obtaining the books to get them to other B5ers who needed them, and/or to have them for new, potential B5 and/or Crusade fans to borrow, not for myself.
Well after all this I'll have to get em and buy em anyways cause this is all too interesting
Is the techno mage trilogy no good? I was actually counting on that to be great as these are characters you can do a lot with...But it's actually the second one...
My personal (and snarky) theory? Book Three was just way too revisionist, and people like me put their copies up on the market. Heck, I just sold the whole trilogy.
I personally didn't care for the Techno-Mage trilogy because I didn't feel that character of Galen in the books was the same one I saw in Crusade. It wasn't bad at all, just not to my taste. The Centauri trilogy was my favorite followed by the Telepath trilogy.
Jan
Is the techno mage trilogy no good? I was actually counting on that to be great as these are characters you can do a lot with...But it's actually the second one...
My personal (and snarky) theory? Book Three was just way too revisionist, and people like me put their copies up on the market. Heck, I just sold the whole trilogy.
Some people didn't like some of the plot of the plot twists, they thought it went against B5 the show proper in some cases. Personally, I enjoyed it, and thought things fit in pretty well. We didn't really learn much at all about the TechnoMages in B5 proper, so the field was pretty open, IMHO.
I personally didn't care for the Techno-Mage trilogy because I didn't feel that character of Galen in the books was the same one I saw in Crusade. It wasn't bad at all, just not to my taste. The Centauri trilogy was my favorite followed by the Telepath trilogy.
Jan
Galen changed and grew so much throughout the TechnoMage and Centauri Trilogies, as well as what little we got to see of Crusade, so, I'm fine with the character in the books
Is the techno mage trilogy no good? I was actually counting on that to be great as these are characters you can do a lot with...
Some people didn't like some of the plot of the plot twists, they thought it went against B5 the show proper in some cases.
Including some very important points where it made Galen look great at the expense of Sheridan. Repeatedly. I'm not exactly a slave to the Cult of the Captain, but it really undermined Sheridan's character, so I prefer to think of those books as non-canon.
Well after all this I'll have to get em and buy em anyways cause this is all too interesting
Did Jeanne Cavelos go beyond what JMS wanted regarding the power of the techno-mages in general, and Galen in particular? Who knows. Hopefully JMS wouldn't let something as big as that slip by him. I asked him on rastb5m (Subject: Attn. JMS: Re. The Del Rey B5 trilogies, Galen in "The Passing of the Techno-mages" and Galen in "Crusade" , Date: Thursday, August 13, 2009 9:51 PM). We'll have to see if he replies. I kinda doubt it, but there's no harm in trying to get an answer, eh?
Not at the expense of Sheridan, at the expense of what you thought Sheridan could do all on his own (No, I'm not counting the fragment of Kosh Naranek that told him "Jump! Jump now!") against the Shadows at Z'ha'dum.
Not at the expense of Sheridan, at the expense of what you thought Sheridan could do all on his own (No, I'm not counting the fragment of Kosh Naranek that told him "Jump! Jump now!") against the Shadows at Z'ha'dum.
Well, that's kind of my point. That scene, Sheridan's supposed to be at the end of his rope, back to the cliff, his wife's betrayed him, all he's got is a Vorlon shard lodged in his brain and the nukes which are about to kill him... I do not see him thinking, "Gee, maybe that technomage will help out any second now."
But then, you're a Galen fanboy and I'm a Kosh fanboy; we'll likely never agree, and that's just fine.
I think you need an = sign [ spoiler = ]
Spoiler for my opinions:Basically, adding Galen to Z'ha'dum at all diminishes the drama of the equation, to my mind. Sheridan is there with what he brought with him. His battle is far more psychological than physical, despite the nukes; it's a very face-to-face encounter. Inserting Galen felt like George Lucas messing with Star Wars...
It may be canon, and JMS's approach to Londo's prophecy may be the Word of God, but in both cases it makes B5 a lesser story, to me. So I overlook it, and have my own interpretations.
I don't really mind Galen being on Z'ha'dum at the same time -- he can take down the Eye and everything else. Just don't have him talk to Sheridan.
I think you need an = sign [ spoiler = ]
I thought that the = sign and words of explanation between the = sign and the ] were optional. Guess not.
Spoiler for Re. Galen, the Whitestar and The Eye:If Galen doesn't take down the Eye, the Whitestar doesn't get through. I have no doubt that several battlecrabs were standing by, possibly in hyperspace near Z'ha'dum, for planetary defense. They'd have taken out the Whitestar before it got within range to do any damage and probably while the nukes were still counting down. Didn't you think it was odd and too easy that The Eye just let the Whitestar through?
Yes, having Galen speak to John Sheridan, even though Galen was invisible (cloaked) and was just a disembodied voice from somewhere in the hallway, was a bit much, and totally unnecessary. It didn't add anything to the story.
It’s just a thought, and probably a very bad one as I haven’t read any of the books.
But given that jms wanted them to be viewed as part of the story of B5, expanding existing elements and introducing new ones. Is it not possible that joe himself wanted these sort of story elements included in order to explain why certain things happened the way they did in the show, such as what your saying about the ‘eye’ etc.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.