<blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr>I agree, it's just that I had just seen posts on this board and other saying perhaps it was an alias. <hr></blockquote>
Wishful (and addled) thinking on somebody's part. JMS would have no reason to suddenly come up with a "code name" for a Rangers series after openly discussing it for nearly a year. Nor would he have pronounced Rangers dead while still talking about Polaris as a project in development. He can be deliberately obscure in his posts, and sometimes he likes to play with fan's heads (as when they're trying to figure out a plot point or mystery), but he's not just plain sadistic.
Right now I don't think there is anything we or anyone else can do about any future B5 projects. Sci-Fi isn't interested, and they have the exclusive on the original series. No one is going to touch a sequel if they don't have that. The decision has been made for now, and since we have no say in the matter, we're just going to have to live with it.
Does this mean that B5 is dead for all time? Probably not. The reruns will continue to air on one network or another, the DVDs will sell, the Del Rey books will stay in print for awhile at least. Eventually it will become a "nostalgia" item, or another SF film will break box office records and somebody at Warner Bros. will say, "Waitaminnit, don't we own something like that?" If Battlestar Galactica of all things can get a new lease on life, and something as obscure as The Prisoner can be made into a feature film, there's always hope for more B5, someday, and in some form. But not today.
Regards,
Joe