As far as I'm concerned, "Believers" was the worst episode.
Believers is one of the best non-arc episodes for me.
As far as I'm concerned, "Believers" was the worst episode.
I agree with you. This ep held absolutely NO surprises for me. 100% predictable, which I can't say about any other ep. Unlike Jan, I was saddly aware of this sort of "journalism" long before I saw the ep.
That's just it, though. From the start B5 has shown us the whole process of how and why things happen as they do and the manipulation of the media was a big part of that process.Exactly...it made its point in the first minute of the broadcast...we didn't have to see ALL of the propaganda...oh well, just finished Atonement and loved it.
It wasn't so much that we as the viewers knew that they'd twist it all beyond belief .. it's that Sheridan didn't. That he thought there was some hope for a "fair" story there. That just didn't make sense to me.
<snip>
And I guess one could say that Sheridan just assumed they had nothing to lose.
Worst B5 Novel: "Clark's Law" / "The Touch of Your Shadow, the Whisper of Your Name" (tie)
How can worst B5 novel be anything but "Personal Agendas"?
I thought it was a bit of a sly dig at Fox and found it quite amusing.
I thought it was a bit of a sly dig at Fox
According to wikipedia, Illusion of Truth aired only four months after the initial air of Fox news. Especially considering how much time it takes from script penning to airing, and how Fox news would not have been big within a few days on the air, I really doubt there is a connection there, it's not like Fox news invented the concept of propaganda...
I can't see that kind of propaganda going through in a country like the US at all. Where you do, actually, have freedom of press, no matter how much some American publications can be full of crap. If you were to publish this kind of complete fabricated rubbish in the US, everyone would be free to check your story, and debunk it within days. I don't for a second believe that Illusion of Truth was aimed at propaganda as encountered in democratic societies. It's propaganda in countries where the powers controll all media, such as Nazi Germany or the Soviet Union.
Exactly.
That's why the criticism "they already had one episode about journalism" makes no sense. The first one was about how it works in a democratic society, the second is about how a fascist power abuses propoganda.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.