It seems to me that the best and fairest way of handling this is to let members of the forum ask any question they want of anybody - with the understanding that neither the actors nor anybody else is
obligated to reply. This is how JMS does things on the moderated newsgroup: If you put "ATTN JMS" in the title of a post, you can be pretty sure he'll read it. But you can't be sure he'll answer, and the group has an informal "no whining if you don't get a reply" rule. We did things the same way on Compuserve. You could address a public message specifically to JMS and if he answered it, fine. If he didn't, also fine.
The Home Theater Forum has a similar rule for two studio execs that are members of the group. You can post an "ATTN Fox" or "ATTN Paramount" message. If either the Fox VP or Paramount VP
can answer the question publicly and
wants to, they do. Otherwise they don't. (HTF goes as far as asking that the members not use the studio folks' names in the thread titles since "Fox" and "Paramount" are enough to get their attention.)
As long as arrangement is agreed to and understood by all parties, we shouldn't have any problems. I certainly think it would be preferable to an outright ban on asking questions.
Just my 2 cents.
Regards,
Joe
------------------
Joseph DeMartino
Sigh Corps
Pat Tallman Division
joseph-demartino@att.net