Obviously they're only going to do that if they think they can increase sales so much by doing so that the added profits will more than off-set the cost of running the ads. I, for one, do not believe that enough extra people are going to buy the disc because of an advertisment on CSI or Desperate Housewives to remotely cover the cost of the ad. (Which on those shows could exceed the budget for the movie.) Be realistic. WB is not going to to blow that kind of money just to satisfy B5 fans who want to see a "prestige" ad campaign and proof that "the studios are finally taking SF seriously". They aren't going to do it, and they shouldn't. I'd much rather they run 10 ads during Battlestar Galactica than one during a primetime network show watched by millions of people who would never buy an SF DVD. The one current primetime hit that [ijmight[/i] be worth a gamble is Heroes, since that has a big comic book geek demo who might not really know from B5 (given how long its been off the air) but for whom the name Straczynski mighr ring a bell.
Again, I'm not sure that they're going to do TV advertising at all, and am also not sure how much would be aimed at "the general public" as opposed to "put out where non-B5 SF fans might see it." I'm thinking websites, magazines, maybe a bonus preview disc included with the existing B5-related DVDs. (I'd be all over that idea.)
Finally I again direct your attention to the question of WB hooking up with a TV partner. If they do that will affect the timing of the release, the advertising and the prospects of reruns of the original show returning to TV. All of that would change the entire picture as now there would be more room for cross-promotion, etc. But we are so far from all of this that speculation is really pointless, except to the degree it let's people vent.
I'll give some thought to the stick idea although it will probably have to wait until WB actually does something, which so far, they haven't.
In any case, from what I've seen Wal-Mart has always carried the various B5 titles. (I think I picked up my copy of the Rangers pilot there.)
KoshN with a Rangers disk !!! That must have been torturous for you to buy...
I hope you got it cheap...
I'm just looking for ways to cast a wider net , to reach people who are outside the established SF fan group, in the interest of making more SF fans and more B5 fans.
Stick idea???
As ironic as this sounds, this is why I have a slim bit of doubt about B5:TLT. I also own the Rangers DVD because I simply have no desire to. As a stand-alone movie (which is what it remains) it just wasn't that good, and frankly was quite painful in some places. That is the last B5 project any of us have seen, so I really hope this new project turns out better.
Isn't that a wee bit of an over reaction?
Shabaz wrote:
> I was browsing around a bit on the IMDB, and on your personal page
> http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0833089/ I saw that it has you listed as
> writing an adaptation of Max Brooks's World War Z for 2008. With IMDB's
> reputation for not always being entirely accurate, I suppose the first
> question should be, is this true? And if so, is there anything you want
> or can tell us about this project?
There's nothing I can say about it at this time.
jms
Now, does an "adaptation" mean a possible pilot for a series or a possible film deal?
More secrets and mysteries.
Well, I know you said it wasn't targeted at Recoil in particular, but I thought his post was pretty mild and not expressed in any way something I would qualify as insulting hand wringing, in tiny bits or otherwise. It's perfectly natural to have both hopes and doubts, I think, and unless you phrase it as "this will suck, because LotR sucked, period" or something like that, I don't think there is anything wrong with expressing it. I mean, saying he has a "slim bit of doubt", and just hopes it is better than LotR is just about as far away you can get from people who go around stating their personal tastes as universal fact, and I thought it was kind of odd that it set you off.Not particularly. I've been reading the whining and hand-wringing and doubts for at least 5 years now. I think it's more than past time for a bit of a rant.
Jan
Pretty sure it is supposed to be a feature film adaptation. And I guess with that answer there is some truth to the IMDB listing, otherwise he would've been able to flat out deny it. But whether he is merely been approached or maybe negotiating, or if has actually signed on, is of course impossible to tell.This isn't TLT news, but I didn't know where else to put this where people seeking "new" news might look.
As always, from the moderated group:
Now, does an "adaptation" mean a possible pilot for a series or a possible film deal?
More secrets and mysteries.
Yes, I said that it wasn't targeted at Recoil and that's exactly what I meant. It was, however, triggered by Recoil's post as I just happened to be in the mood for a good rant tonight. When you've seen posts over several forums with the same 'Oh, I didn't like the last thing he did so I hope this new thing won't suck' posts over a period of time, eventually one simply gets sick and tired of it.Well, I know you said it wasn't targeted at Recoil in particular, but I thought his post was pretty mild and not expressed in any way something I would qualify as insulting hand wringing, in tiny bits or otherwise.
I'm just looking for ways to cast a wider net , to reach people who are outside the established SF fan group, in the interest of making more SF fans and more B5 fans.
Now, does an "adaptation" mean a possible pilot for a series or a possible film deal?
This isn't TLT news, but I didn't know where else to put this where people seeking "new" news might look
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.