Does anyone else envision Moore sitting somewhere reading National Geographic and reading an article about Mitochondrial Eve and thinking, "Hey, that'd be a neat hook for a sci-fi story."
"Wouldn't it be cool if..."
However, I don't mind that at all in thiis case, and didn't mean to give the impression I did. It's one part of the finale that made any sense to me, actually.
FWIW, my issue with he "god did it" is NOT the inclusion of God per se, despite my personal atheism, nor do I think the subject doesn't belong in the genre or anything like that. It's HOW they did- leaving the nature and will of this crucial character or force so vague, which allows for the story teller to do anything without consequence.
You know, the fact that I had to write it that way- "character or force"- tells me a lot. What is the role, dramatically, of "god" in this show? Is it a character- a person (albeit with amazing super-powers or omnipotence or whatever, as he is in the Bible) with thoughts and feelings and desires? Is it a force, like a hurricane or gravity or magic?
When you have characters with motivations, you can trace a series of actions to an end that will leave you with an emotional resonance. When you have a force of some sort that our characters have to work with or against, you have a frame of reference, an obstoacle or tool or.... hell, SOMETHING. But here we have... what, exactly? A force? A person? A thing? Nature? Our god? A god? What does it want? What is it doing? Why? For Pete's sake give me
something I can hang my hat on. Something I can follow that defines the narrative, the goddamn POINT of the FRACKING STORY. At the end of the day.... why should we give a shit?
I do wonder what VL and TruthSeeker, and any others who feel "betrayed" or unsatisfied by the finale were expecting, or what they would've done differently
A reason for why stuff happened. Rather, what we got was "it's all a big mystery!" That is bullshit.
It seems their objections aren't that characters believe in God(s), but, rather that the series ended with an absolute confirmation of a God, and didn't explain it away it as advanced species (although the final line does leave some room to theorize God may not have been a God afterall)
I wish it ended with such a confirmation- all we know is that there's
something. God, like any other idea or thing, is meaningless without more than it's simple existence.
Frankly if I'd be religious I'd be offended. People don't just worship god because he's there. They worship him because he has a plan for them, or saves them, or they're scared of him, or them... they have a relationship with some power that his thoughts and deeds and motivations and a will of some sort.
Re: Recoil's 150,000 vs 15,000 yrs:
My gut reaction to the idea of the BSG people essentially creating human civilization is that it's "cheesy."
Remember that a bunch of those settlers were cylons, and I think it's safe to assume none of them had kids.
The other stuff (like language/laws, etc,) who knows. It could have been passed down, then somewhere along the way it was lost temporarily and rediscovered. Not sure. It's a big hole, isn't it.
I think the way to look at it is that if you had two races of humans develop biologically the same on two different planets independatlly, they would do the same culturally.
The real absurd part is just that- two completely different planets having biologically identical human races. A famous quote (I believe attributed to Sagan but I'm not sure) is that it would be easier for a man to mate with a flower than with any alien species.
I do believe this means I'm right. He wanted an emotional send-off, and fudged the plot to do it
Well yeah- I think a number of us have been saying this in some fashion for a while. It's why I expected the plot to not resolve in a really good way, because it's clear the writers didn't care so much.